Freesoulblog - English Comments
back to the main blog

august 4, 2012 (0133us)  

SpiragraphOne fine day, Lucette P., a lady lawyer, a great supporter of our mission for many years, now gone to where our last breath will hustle all of us, planned to publish The Book (2d part of The Revelation of Arès) without any bracketed words.
She thought that only what had entered my ears was true. She had doubts about whatever has entered my heart, printed in brackets. In other words, the sound but not the Core (Rev of Arès xxxiv/6-12).
I replied to her, "You're acting rationalistic like in the courtroom where the witness's voice, but not his thought, is heard. During the Theophanies, 1977, I perceived both, because the Father put me in a state of complete perception. The prophet is the one that perceives all. She dithered for some time just to save face, and then gave up her plan.
Lately, I received a few messages to warn me than a Sister Maryse wanted to publish The Revelation of Arès without my footnotes and commentaries, which she would consider as doctrinaire and unbearable.
I answered, "My word is the Word of the Father (Rev of Arès i/12, xxxi/10), I've got the Wind, I speak to the brothers as the Father does not speak to them (xx/12-19) and the part of the just prophet (35/5, xxxi/10, xxxvii/2) is to explain. I have never forced anybody to listen to me and, anyway, just as Gamaliel said to the Sanhedrin, "If my words are just mine, they will destroy themselves, but if they are God's, nothing will ever destroy them. Never fight against God (The Acts of the Apostles 5/38-39)."

Knowledge... About The Revelation of Arès do I have the knowledge of It or only a knowledge among others? I have the knowledge. I've got it along with the Word. If I had not, could I be the Justice of the just one (Rev of Arès xxxi/10)? Nevertheless, some say that I have got a knowledge, but that it is debatable, and others say that I have misunderstood the knowledge and they correct it. Who can know and what is to know?

Can I in one way or another compel anybody to believe in my knowledge without his agreement? Anybody can say he believes, even if he does not believe inwardly.
In one way or another again, all of our missionaries know that the witness to the only real Master does not carry very much weight with the swarming master (Rev of Arès 18/1-3) of the world, who knows everything, has understood everything, shrugs his shoulders or feels outraged while reading The Revelation of Arès. Not two weeks go by when I do not receive a letter from a condescending explainer or a disexplainer. Is this because people do not agree that I say what I say and do not come under the control of what all others say? Is this because people want the truth to be democratic and be discussed by everybody, even though endlessly, but never to be given by one head? Is this because every man wants to find his way only deep down by himself?
In short, people do not want a single Thought, but The Revelation of Arès is not a Thought. It is the Truth, if that! It is the Truth that is not, but that could be: the world changed (Rev of Arès 28/7) for the better. In other words, it is the knowledge of what has to be, but not of what is and may never be if the sin of sins (38/2) comes up before the change is made.

The Truth of The Revelation of Arès is not a correspondence between the speech and the fact, but it is between the speech and the Design, the achievement of which is man's prerogative. It is the exact opposite of religious dogmas which can't see God but as the purpose of everything on earth.
Now, The Revelation of Arès sees man as the purpose of everything on earth. It is not a knowledge which solves "the darkness of the mystery of humans doomed to the freedom of Good as well as Evil (Jorge Semprùn)." It is is just the knowledge of the alternative. The ones who see it as an absolute knowledge waste their time. The ones who see it as the logos (reason) have a better understanding: The Father's reason is that Good should be preferred to Evil, but he leaves man free to think of the opposite. His Truth is not the undisputable privilege of a Master who punishes his opponents, but it is a free choice. It is why a Socrates, for instance, might be a prophet when he insisted he did not know anything in order to help others think better, just as The Revelation of Arès does not know where man will go, to Good or to Evil; it does nothing but warn that Evil can lead to greater and greater sufferings, but does not keep man from preferring them.
All we The Revelation of Arès missionaries have to do is call on people to prefer Good by reminding the indifferent or the unconscious of the spiritual strength, which any man can awake within himself, if he wants to bring out the "powers that do or undo truths (Paul Valéry)", and that the truth of The Revelation of Arè is the best, even if it is neither the only one nor the most convincing today. Can we thereby better see that we are not a religion, but a knowledge, the knowledge of an alternative still possible, though we don't know how long it will be?

Do the Bible and the Quran give anything but alternatives? Whatever in their contents is not an alternative, but an absolute reward or an absolute sentence, has been added by man. To do so the transcriber often had nothing to do but change a word or a few words. But God is Mercy, because He admits that there is such a thing as Evil and through His Compassion shows the way to Good as an alternative. Everybody is struck by how opposite are the sentence "In the Name of Allah the Merciful, the Compassionate", which tops every sura, and contents that proclaim merciless convictions.

Man is endowed with an autonomous power of choosing, so that the Word would get nothing more even if It would be a kind of masterful absolutist announce; man would keep on choosing. In his foreword to "The Encyclopedia" unbeliever d'Alembert said "Each man thinks all by himself", unaware that he thereby expressed the real faith. If we trod the streets like Evangelists warning that the alternative is Christ or Hell, we would be judges, but not apostles. But, if we were not aware that a small remnant of penitents will be enough to save the world, we would not be better than Evangelists when we tread the streets showing two ways: The way to Good, which will lead mankind to God, even those who do not believe in Him today, and the way that Adam has chosen (Rev of Arès 2/1-5), wherever it leads to, and if it leads to the frozen darkness (16/15, 33/33) or to the sin of sins (38/2), you can believe me, people don't give a damn about it just as a smoker doesn't give a damn the smoke.
Our knowledge gives strength to our faith, through which we will make the small remnant of penitents who will save the world, but if it consisted merely in an argument of propaganda or a highbrow reasoning , let's admit that the future would not be guaranteed.  

copyright 20112
Add a comment

00Xxx00 133USC1
Xxxx xx xxxx xxx xx x xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxx xx xxx .

Reply :
Xxxx xx xxxx xxx xx x xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxx xx xxx xxx.

00Xxx00  133USC2

Reply :
Xxxx xx xxxx xxx xx x xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxx xx xxx xxx.