august 18, 2006 (0038us)
will any day the chocolate virgin be gagged?
|
After
one of the most fervent pilgrimages in Arès, without any trace of it in
the papers, I am set on by news thick and fast like by fleas from the black
dog (Rev of Ares XLIII/11, XLV/1):
In
the Near East, as no basic problem is solved or about to be so, it's
just a truce; well, that's something anyway. Mother Violence
hates
being bored, so it moves to Colombo, Sri Lanka; a mammoth brawl "for
some unclear reason" between protesters for peace and Buddhistic monks;
ragged yellow gowns; hundreds of people bashed up taken to the
hospital. Qumran (where the Dead Sea biblical scrolls were found) was
not an essenian or protochristian monastery, but an ancient tile
factory or a public dump, quite simply. Right on the middle of the
Pacific three castaways are found, Mexican fishermen who were drifting
for months, their engine out of order, living on rain water and raw
fish; it seems as if no one had given a damn about them, their
disappearance had never been reported. A miracle at the chocolate shop
Angiono, Fountain Valley, California: A "chocolate holy Mary" has
miraculously formed under a cocoa vat; "That's just like the virgin of
Lourdes", they say (see picture). Detroit, Michigan, a federal judge
rules that phone-tapping ordered by President Bush is illegal even on
antiterrorism grounds. London, the exact opposite of the previous piece
of news: Interior ministers gather together to discuss nothing less
than the blocking of "all of the websites favorable to terrorism."
I
push the papers aside and close my eyes. It's clear to me that, just as
all powers from time immemorial have controlled ideas and information,
current politicians see terrorism as the excuse to screen the internet
with a view to deleting from it whatever displeases them.
Five
minutes ago my darn stupid old jeering humor, I admit, came back to the
fore when I read the story of the chocolate virgin, but now that I read
news of politicians being discussing repressive censorship of the web
my lips freeze. How about that somewhat silly chocolate virgin turning
into a martyr to liberty? If, as it has already occurred in history,
some movement of opposition to the world's powers adopted Mary
as an emblem? That chocolate Mary might be considered as dangerous and
banned from the web. As the politicians in London state that "apart
from any support for terrorism, no standard expression of conscience is
to be banned on-line," but do not specify what they mean by that, you
never know.
Ever since the internet started I have expected it to
be censored. People used to tell me, "On the web it is technically
impossible to take control of the spread of ideas. The spread of ideas
is to stay forever free." I used to reply, "The powers have continously
striven to control man's conscience. They will likewise be striving to
control it on the internet. On this basic points just as on other basic
points our mission is important. We have to show the paths to
salvation and happiness through penitence and at the same
time we have to remind men of the impossibility of reaching absolute good
without first gaining absolutely free expression of conscience, which
has to be set free from the harnesses that the system has
always put on it (Rev of Ares 10/10).
|
Post a comment |
|